If you were forwarded this email (Hi! Welcome!), you can sign up to the newsletter here.
Good morning!
I’m a sucker for a weather stat - so it’s a shoutout to readers in Perth, who just experienced the coldest day in 50 years. 50! Years!
Yesterday’s maximum of 11.4°C matched the shivers of July 29, 1975, but the 2025 edition featured some rain and hail too. The rain is set to stick around for the next couple of days, continuing what I’ve been told is a very, very rainy winter for the West.


I’ve got 10 seconds
Quote of the day
“I bear her no ill will. My prayer for her is that she will use her time in jail wisely to become a better person. Now I am no longer Erin Patterson’s victim, and she has become the victim of my kindness.”
The sole survivor of the fatal beef wellington lunch, Ian Wilkinson, during his victim impact statement to convicted triple-murderer Erin Patterson. Patterson served Ian, his wife Heather, her sister Gail and her husband Don a meal laced with death cap mushrooms in July 2023. Ian was hospitalised for months after the lunch, but ultimately survived.
Stat of the day
90%
The percentage of teachers who are experiencing severe stress, according to new research from UNSW. The study found teachers experience depression, anxiety and stress at three times the national average.
Random fact of the day
The average colour of the universe is called 'Cosmic latte'. In a 2002 study, astronomers found that the light coming from galaxies averaged into a beige colour that’s close to white.

I’ve got 30 seconds
Some headlines from this morning:
Australia is on track to reach its 2030 climate target, according to Federal Government data. Australia has committed to cutting emissions by 43% on 2005 levels by 2030, as part of the United Nations’ Paris Agreement. The latest report from the Department of Climate Change shows national greenhouse emissions fell by 1.4% over the year to March, 28% below 2005 levels. Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said, “if we stay the course and continue to lift our efforts,” Australia is “well on the way” to reaching its 2030 goal. It comes as MPs debate a proposal being led by Nationals backbencher Barnaby Joyce to walk back Australia’s emissions reduction targets.
Evacuation orders are in place for over half a million people in Vietnam, as Typhoon Kajiki crosses the country’s east coast. The system made landfall last night, bringing with it heavy rainfall and extreme conditions. Parts of eastern Vietnam were already battered by winds of up to 166 km/h, with gusts intensifying overnight. Authorities warned the typhoon could lead to “severe flooding in urban areas” and “landslides in the mountains,” as well as widespread power outages. Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh issued an “urgent directive” over the weekend, warning Kajiki is highly likely to affect coastal provinces. It prompted mass evacuations across central and eastern Vietnam. Officials are comparing the typhoon’s strength to Yagi, which killed an estimated 300 people when it tore through Vietnam nearly a year ago.

Recommendation of the day
Backed by an Olympic boxer, so you know it’s good
Harry Garside is hitting the TCS Sydney Marathon with Ninja by his side – think grit, grace, and a whole lot of energy.
From pre-run fuel to post-run recovery, Ninja’s got you covered. Power, performance, purpose – whatever your finish line looks like, with Ninja, you can make it.

I’ve got 1 minute

A Qld court has found Brisbane Council illegally discriminated against Extinction Rebellion
A Queensland court has ruled Brisbane City Council unlawfully discriminated against an environmental activist group by banning it from using public libraries and facilities.
The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal decision comes six years after the council voted to introduce the ban on members of Extinction Rebellion.
The case was brought by one group member, who argued she was discriminated against because of her political beliefs.
The tribunal ordered the council to overturn the ban.
Group
Extinction Rebellion is an international political movement, which says it uses “non-violent direct action and civil disobedience” to lobby governments to address climate change.
In Australia, the group has orchestrated large-scale protests, including blockades of bridges in major cities.
Following a series of protests, multiple Australian jurisdictions introduced harsher penalties for protesters found to have caused disruptions to public transport, traffic, or major infrastructure.
The ban
In 2019, Brisbane City Council passed a motion banning Extinction Rebellion from using the city’s publicly owned facilities for meetings.
At the time, the council argued its spaces were “not suitable meeting places for organisations that advocate or incite illegal activities,” finding the group fell into that category.
Members were notified of the ban the following day, with existing bookings immediately cancelled.
Case
Following the ban, Extinction Rebellion member Miree Le Roy filed a legal complaint against the council, accusing it of breaching Queensland’s anti-discrimination laws.
In her defence, Le Roy said Extinction Rebellion is a global movement, with about 4,000 members in Queensland.
She argued the group is a “community collective of like-minded individuals,” and that the ban unfairly impacted thousands of people “who have the same political belief”.
The council defended its decision, arguing that a “substantial purpose” of Extinction Rebellion is to “engage in large-scale, coordinated and premeditated unlawful activities”.
It maintained that Le Roy and the group were not treated less favourably than others “on the basis of [their] beliefs or activities”.
This week, the tribunal sided with Le Roy, finding that because Extinction Rebellion has no formal membership structure, the ban was likely to impact a broad range of people, including those who “may have just subscribed to the website to get some information”.
Reporting by Achol Arok.

I’ve got 2 minutes

First home buyers will be able to put down a 5% deposit on properties from 1 October
All first-home buyers will be eligible to put down a 5% deposit on a property from 1 October, down from the usual 20% deposit.
The maximum price of properties available to buy with the scheme will be limited, depending on the city or region. The Government will also cover lenders’ mortgage insurance.
Labor planned to expand the scheme from 2026, but has brought it forward, describing the move as a “game changer” for aspiring home owners.
However, independent housing experts and the Opposition have argued it should be more targeted.
The scheme
The lower deposit scheme was first set up in 2020 to allow first-home owners to get a property with a 5% deposit.
Banks usually ask for a 20% up-front deposit for a home purchase.
The scheme is currently capped at a certain number of places annually. In 2024/25, it was limited to 50,000 new entrants to the property market.
The scheme also currently has income caps — $125,000 for individuals and $200,000 for couples.
Changes
In April, Labor announced it would expand the current scheme to all first-home buyers from 2026 if it won the May election.
On Monday, it announced that the scheme will come into effect from 1 October.
This means there will no longer be income tests or limited places for first-home owners.
The change won’t require legislation, meaning the Government doesn’t need to rely on broader political support to pass the measure through Parliament.
There will continue to be limits on the value of properties first home-buyers can purchase with a 5% deposit. However, the new limits will be higher than the existing caps.
For example, a Sydney or Newcastle home will be capped at $1.5 million for those on the scheme. Currently, it’s $900,000.
Regional Western Australia homes will be capped at $600,000, up from the existing limit of $400,000.
The latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) shows the average property price in Australia has recently climbed above $1 million.
Insurance
Banks and lenders usually require buyers who don’t have a 20% deposit to pay for Lender’s Mortgage Insurance.
This is a safety net for a bank providing a mortgage (loan), in case the buyer struggles to pay off their home loan in the future or sells their property at a lower value than when it was purchased.
While the bank takes out the insurance policy, it requires the buyer to pay the insurance bill, which can run to tens of thousands of dollars.
The Government will become a ‘guarantor’ for the lenders’ insurance, meaning a new homeowner won’t have to pay for it.
Housing Minister Clare O’Neil said the Government wants to ensure more renters own a home.
“It’s just not right that an entire generation of young Australians have been locked out of the housing market — saving for decades while paying off someone else’s mortgage,” O’Neil said.
She said it could help people who are saving for a home deposit buy a house “seven or eight years” earlier.
Coalition
Shadow Housing Minister Senator Andrew Bragg said the scheme will “help on the margins”.
However, he cautioned against the “uncapped” income limits, saying it’s opened the scheme up to “the children of billionaires”.
“The taxpayer is underwriting mortgage insurance schemes for extremely wealthy people,” Bragg told the ABC.
He called the housing crisis “a supply side challenge”.
Expert view
Housing expert and author Peter Mares told TDA he’s concerned about opening up the scheme to those “who don’t need it”.
He also urged anyone applying for lower deposits to “stress test” their personal circumstances, such as relationship breakdowns, having children, interest rate rises, and job losses.
“ Instead of buying with a 20% deposit and an 80% mortgage, they’re now buying with a 5% deposit and a 95% mortgage. So there is a higher risk here of people getting into financial trouble,” Mares said.
Reporting by Harry Sekulich.

A message from Optus
If you dread seeing your weekly screen time, this might be the phone for you.
The Nothing Phone (3) isn’t here to take over your life – it’s built to blend into it. With a sleek, see-through design and glowing Glyph lights, it’s refreshing, not overwhelming.
Plus, it's got Gemini Live - your built-in AI assistant that helps with recipes, planning, tech fixes and more, all through a natural back-and-forth chat.
Buy now, pay later at Optus.


Give me some good news

An international team of biologists has found an artificial way to give bees a crucial nutrient, boosting their population.
Bees are a key part of the global ecosystem, pollinating crops to allow them to reproduce, helping biodiversity and directly impacting the food we eat. They need a specific nutrient in the pollen they consume from flowers, which is increasingly difficult to find in nature. Beekeepers have resorted to giving their bees artificial replacements, but these options have lacked the proper nutrients. Now, British and Danish researchers have developed a more “nutritionally complete” option. During recent trials, bees that ate this new pollen replacement reproduced at higher rates compared to other bees. The scientists used gene-editing technology to engineer a “sustainable and affordable” pollen replacement. It’s hoped the breakthrough could support bee colonies and global food supplies for years to come.
Want more good news? Sign up for our weekly Good Newsletter here - we promise it’ll make your week better!
Reporting by Lucy Tassell.

TDA titbit

The UK Government has announced plans to ban people from pubs in place of jail time.
Under a new bill, judges would be able to bar offenders from pubs, football matches, concerts, and other social venues, alongside conditions like drug testing or travel limits.
UK Justice Minister Shabana Mahmood said: “When criminals break society’s rules, they must be punished. Those serving their sentences in the community must have their freedom restricted there too.”
Reporting by Rosa Bowden.

Want more from The Daily Aus? Listen to our podcast!
Over the weekend, both Erik and Lyle Menendez were denied parole by a California review board. The brothers have spent more than three decades in prison for murdering their parents.
Renewed interest in the case saw them resentenced in May, marking what many saw as their best chance at freedom in over 30 years. But the parole hearings revealed previously unknown details about their conduct behind bars.
Today, we're unpacking what came out in these hearings, the violations that swayed the board's decision, and what avenues remain for the brothers' potential release.

TDA asks








